Peirce/Dewey foundational education quotes...

Hi Herb, here's that quote we assembled last night, plus extras...

It is a true foundation for a self-reliance education___"When one follows their own logic, of self, and or other concepts, to its, and or their grand-finali, one discovers the whole truth of said concepts, by doing the absolute differential and integral mechanics of concepts required, to discover their entire self-truths." HH & LG

The law of self-completion___"Self-educate oneself to the grand-logical-finali, of total differential and integral mechanics of self-conceptual-truth." HH & LG

Application of The Above Laws of Thought

Iff, we apply these laws to last night's debate about economics/credit systems, verses ecology systems/environmentalism, we must apply both sides of the equation of total conceptual mechanics, and not just one, which actually just axiomatizes one over the other or both. Now, you as environmentalist want physiology to be the #1 priority, of "Earth First", and I of course state my #1 priority, of "Economic Earth First". In order to resolve these opposing opinions, we must not only differentiate with Cartesian reduction, but we then must integrate with Peirce and Dewey induction, thoroughly. If we do not integrate all our systems, into either/both system opinion/s, we simply only create a pseudo-axiom of thought, the same problem plaguing the world since DesCartes and before. To only differentiate/reduce systems to our favorite system axiom, ie, "Earth First", "Economics First", or as DeCartes and Marx did, "Humanism First", is to make the gravest mistake of logic and thought possible, as these are just simple differential reductions, thus axioms, and are not true to total systems' integration. We must apply a total conceptual systems' mechanics integration, to all our concepts/axioms, also, to arrive at any truth of our differentials/reductions, therefore; all systems' mechanics must be given their true priorities of global actions, and not simply influenced by our passions. So, if we are to be fair in making clear assessments of thinking, we must compare the priorities of total differentiations and integrations, completely, not partially. When we do this fairly, and using our nation only, as that's all we as Americans are truly responsible for, and politically possible of presently achieving, due to America's duty to her self-preservation "First", whether we like it or not, is the reality. Yet, when we extend our vision to a world, we quickly see the damage of our actions, but we must start where we can be affective, and that's here at home___"First". By starting here at home, we find a nation not in anywhere's near as much environmental stress as are other nations, especially compared to China, Russia and many of Africa's nations. If we falsely extend these nations' environmental stresses onto our own nation, we'd quickly see our own environmental movement, over the last thirty years, pushing our own environmental dirt and damage into such nations as China, Russia and Africa___This we must admit, not deny. To not admit this into the integral side of the necessary equations, to arrive at total systems' truths, is simply fallacious thinking. By admitting said truths, we quickly realize the global ecological/environmental problem is presently beyond our economic-political-environmental power to change___influence maybe, but not change. This is not to say it's not possible somewhere in the future, when America comes under extreme environmental/ecological/physiological stress, to address such problems, but at present, it's way down the list of political priorities for the power-elites, and that's truly who we must address our concerns to, and not to those who think exactly like our own thinking___which goes nowhere...

Herb, all I'm saying is America is not under enough ecological stress yet, to warrent true political action, without doing more damage to America and the world, until it becomes possible to bring China, Russia and Africa under the full power of the "Kyoto Treaty" "First", and this will take great political will, and billions of dollars of support, by environmentalists and other nations' political will and money influence, warrenting major credit system support "First", as otherwise, we simply push our pollution on nations unwilling to support the good-action-environmentalism of the "Kyoto Treaty". In other words, "We do more harm than good", as at present, the wealthier nations are respecting the desires of the "Kyoto Treaty" more than the nations actually signed to it, even as America, not being a signatory, actually respects far more of the "Kyoto Treaty", than does China, a signatory. Therefore, the systems' mechanics integration of credit, market and trade structures must be a major part of any "Earth First" philosophy, to support the ecologists'/environmentalists' desires, as without the economic/political support necessary to sign, and legally enforce, all nations to the "Kyoto Treaty", all efforts will fail, and a much dirtier planet will greet us all, long into the future.

So, axiomatizing "Earth First", "Humanity First", "Ecology/Physiology First", without the integral conceptual mechanics of total systems, is simply a self-defeatest philosophy, as no matter what is thought___money rules all systems___that's not an axiom___it's a fundamental physical fact, and this won't change until ecologists/environmentalists/humanists/physiologists come up with a credit system superior to capitalism/socialism/communism, to support their desires of all "Earth First" philosophies___Without such, it's just pseudo-dream-axiomatic thought, ungrounded in any true economic-political reality___We as humans, have to deal with "Real-Politik", or no politics at all, as it's still a "Dog Eat Dog World", and will be long into China and Russia's economic-political influences, on real world "Politik"...

Note to another...

Hi, and yeah, I'm still here in Rockland, but will be leaving for Florida, sometime in October. As to the economy and politics, everything is really on hold, until Obama takes office. I'll be certified mailing him over the next two months, with my suggestions, and suggestions for whom he needs in and on his eco-political team. I'll be persistent, and really won't stop trying to influence him for his entire term. We and he, need Dr. Paul Davidson and Dr. Jane D'Arista, on his team in a big way. They represent the path America must take to survive, and only they do. It's the same ideas I've supported and written about myself, since the mid-80's. Even Plato was the first to mention "International Financial Architecture" reform, then Benjamin Franklin, Dr. Paul Einzig, John M. Keynes, myself, Dr. Paul Davidson and Jane D'Arista. So, it's not a new eco-political idea; it's just the fact, "True intelligence has never yet been tried." So, let's hope it finally will be...