The Innate Modal Ratio-Logic of Hope…

Most are so influenced by the old adage; “If we do not learn from the past, we are doomed to repeat it”, that they take this worn-out phrase as gospel__Nothing could be further from the truth. What’s the past got to do with the future…? Do we want or need to know this dated ancestral worship phrase at all...? Does it serve any community of people, to worship the mistakes of the past...? Is worshipping the dead knowledge of the past, one of our major problems, or possibly the entire problem, with learning and academics...? I say plainly and simply__Yes it is…!!!

Instead of people being guided into the creative directional knowledge and wisdom of better future courses of action__far too many schools of thought are far too overly-concentrated on studying the dead past’s mistakes__instead of any real and true hope for our necessary futures. Do we want to repeat the past…? No…!!! Then why keep studying the bad non-directionality of our ancestors__They’ve eliminated not, the poverty, that’s truly creating the crime and wars…? This seems to me to be the most foolish action possible, to follow, as what’s truly needed is a new directional intelligence into our solid futures of new, possible, probable and necessary hopes. This would be the modal logics of a new future directional path for our overly concentrated “in the past” mentalities. We must begin to redirect our minds to these new possible futures, if we are ever to truly move forward, and leave these dead past fallacies to the dustbins of history__where they’ve belonged for far too long, for my memory to even conceive…

If one just truly looks to the world’s greatest orators__What was their true power…? Was it talking ceaselessly about the dead past, or new, possible and better futures, and their purity of hope…? The answer is easy__It was always talking about new, possible, probable and necessary better futures, whether we speak of Gandhi, Martin Luther King or John F. Kennedy, etc, on and on__Then go back through all history’s great orators and oratory writers, and you’ll easily see the world was attracted to the new roads of “The Directional Hope for New Futures”, they all offered__Not, re-hashing the dead and useless past…

If there’s one lesson we must learn; “It’s the lesson of paying attention to the positive hope, for the new actionable and directional intelligence futures, that may be offered by all beings, living or dead, all throughout history, since hope springs eternal, in the human soul, if one but looks__Is the all pervasively important path to follow and or lead…” I can tell you sincerely, that from all my years of study, I never learned anything from any of those teachers of the negative voices, harping on the ancestral worships, of eras long passed away. I only learned from the greats with the positive messages of hope, for better futures__and I don’t, for a second, think anyone can learn anything from these pessimistic pin-heads, of the negative schools of thought. We learn new and positive paths, and directions of true actionable intelligence__Only from those ‘Great Dreamers of Hope’__For better tomorrows…!!!

It’s now been a thousand years since this plausible ground was first fully ploughed and harrowed, by the great Ibn Sina__and it’s technical name is ‘modal logic’, the logic of future hope, divided into its three major classifications of__Possibility__Probability__and, Necessity, or those thinking states most aligned with Hope__Which is ‘Always future tense’__’Never, past tense…’ And, anyone who doesn’t recognize the necessity of honestly thinking about the future state of humanity’s needs, in a world running short of resources and intellectual talent, is blind, to the realities we face__as a caring species…

So, my major suggestion is to thoroughly investigate what ‘innate modal logic’ truly is, and who of history were its greatest proponents. As a clue, these famous orators and oratory writers have existed in all ages, and were finally brought to its highest levels in the three main orators, Gandhi, Kennedy and King, yet they’d never have achieved the level of actionable and directional intelligence they achieved, if they hadn’t learned the extreme importance of ‘The Modal Logic of Hope’. And, where did this mostly come from…? It came from the study of every positive logic student who ever studied the positive logic greats, from the beginning of time, but it’s truly not even a scholarly learning process__It’s the truly innate functioning mechanics of all human minds’ deep inner core, if they but recognize__the “dead-negatives” must all be canceled__to see the possible, probable and necessary “positive hopes”, for the better, future, possible state actions, and directions, of all humankind…

My studies never taught me a thing, until I discovered my own path of hope, and all the greats of history, who taught this same directional path of actionable intelligence and wisdom… The ‘possible’ futures’ social directions, teach the present__Everything__The past’s ‘negative-impossible’ directions for any social futures, teaches the present__Nothing…!!!

I think we better study the modal logicians, or at least, start using our own innate modal logics__Perceptronic logic__The Simple Innate Ratio-Logic of, Better Hoped-For, and Self-Sovereignly Created Futures…!!! Don’t you…???

Tribute To Our "New Deal..."

TRANS-MODERNITY is KEY...

Peirce and Latin American "razonabilidad": Forerunners of Transmodernity, by Fernando Zalamea(I've followed him for years...) Link to full article...

After Modernism and Postmodernism, Transmodernism has been advocated as a more faithful coining for our plastic and transient age. Introduced by the Spanish philosopher Rosa María Rodríguez Magda, the term "Transmodernity" –both diachronic and methodological- hopes to reintegrate many awkward postmodern differentials, to balance some supposed breaks with more in-depth sutures, to counter relativism with a topological logic where some "universal relatives" provide invariants beyond the flux of transformations. In many ways, Peirce’s architectonic system of philosophy included already most of the salient features of Transmodernity, a situation which perhaps explains the unusual relevance of Peirce’s thought in the beginning of a new millennium. In fact, Peirce’s system is essentially topological, open to all sorts of continuous transformations (pragmatic maxim, triadic semiotic, classifications of sciences, synechism, etc), and the system is particularly able to represent a bimodal net (Petitot) of both differentials and invariants, providing a full understanding of the TRANS prefix. On the other hand, a steady tradition of Latin American thought at the beginning of XXth century has advocated the importance of some sort of "razonabilidad" (term introduced by the Uruguayan philosopher Carlos Vaz Ferreira, merging "razón"/reason and "sensibilidad"/sensibility) which must explore the borders (TRANS) of thought. A subcontinent fully traversed by change, Latin America has been able to construct various sophisticated synthetic fabrics, weaving autonomous and foreign threads, where the social and cultural transits of the region have acquired some of the highest artistic expressions of the XXth century. Beyond Postmodernist skepticism towards reason and universality, both Peirce’s system and Latin American TRANS culture help to reinterpret universals as partial invariants of a logic of change, where the borders of reason and sensibility appear as objects of reason in their own right. The important crisis revealed by Postmodernism (impossibility of unique perspectives, impossibility of cutting out antinomies, impossibility of stable hierarchies, etc.) can nevertheless be well understood using a continuous geometrical logic of reason and sensibility, open both to changes and invariances. This short article is intended as a programmatic one, pointing out the possible relevance that some non-standard pragmatic thinking (Peirce’s "pragmaticism", Latin America’s "razonabilidad") may have for our Transmodern epoch. The article is divided in four sections: (i) Transmodernity; (ii) Peirce’s system; (iii) Latin America’s TRANS essayists; (iv) A sought gluing for our epoch.

TRANS-MODERNITY is KEY...(continued...)

The Memory to Senses Continuum Is A Violation of Q.M. & T.U.P…

The violation I intend to address is the embeddedness logics of motions and information paths’ preservations, absolutely rationally required to exist in the perceptual matrix of minds, and the chiral geometry of, which is absolutely rationally required to violate both the laws of quantum mechanics, and the uncertainty principle__To function. As the diagram below states; “Absolute truths and knowledge exist within these embeded logics”, and these imbeddednesses cause all the incompletenesses of our knowledge systems. Iff, this be true, is it possible to arrive at the mathematical proofs of these quantum and uncertainty violations? I’ll further state, we have other direct analogies of these same violation processes, and embedded hidden variables of motion and informations, in the human bio-cells, chemistry and the psychology of our foreign exchange markets. Is rational and logical necessity enough for a proof of what is stated and drawn…? Can these rational necessities prove the Continuum Hypothesis…? I think they can…



And that’s just what the above graphic implies, and that is it’s all like reason being rationalized to logic, to me, or knowing that; "The rational esthetic necessity of all emotions, is identical to justice and liberty for all of humanity", achieveing the same. I'd say this is also a pretty good analogy of the conceptual processes of perception. And this is the very key to the quantum mechanics of super-positioning I was getting at with my first post and graphic, on this thread, and all that’s been mentioned on ‘East Meets West Logic’, as well. The only scientific way to explain perception's ability to unite right and left hemisphere knowledges and concepts, especially of memory mapping to perception and concepts, is to realize the mind does work as a quantum super-positioning computer, at the photon's, boson's, etc., levels of concept mechanics. So, you Leskey have actually stumbled into the very heart of what I've all along, when I've had the chance to mention it, been talking about__The heart and center of QCD(quantum chromo-dynamics), and the uncertainty principle's true mechanics, by the very rational necessity of memory maintaining the quantum continuum's continuity(wave super-positioning) link(inter-communication abilities) for an entire lifespan__otherwise memory couldn't stay linked to perception at will, all our lives. To me this is the most important realization physics can make. I discovered it about six months ago. Thanks for reminding me what my true mission is__The physics' quantum proofs of rationally necessary unification of all quantum particle/wave/field motions and the physical facts of their actual violation of quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle...

Iff all can just see the absolutely rational necessity of the memory to conception mapping, to the perception continuum's true continuities, then we've a clear vision inside the entire uncertainty principle and QCD, which at the most innate level, is thoroughly positively continuously linked, throughout our lives. Thus, the uncertainty principle has a certain real mechanical feature positively seeable by us, just as my signature states; "The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G. And, this is at the same time, a solid violation of the quantum state’s required continuous motions, as thus far scientifically realized and accepted, yet may be the stored state matrix of centered and fixed point(micro-black holes at center of protons…?) motions, for the entire bio-life of us simple beings. And, it’s also a clear violation of not being able to see the momentum and position of the particle wave, when in fact, it absolutely is a rational necessity for it to be permanently stored in a fixed state of no more than a cycloidic angular motion spin state__completely recallable at any desired moment, by the bio-will of innate being__and must be a fixed point state, else how could will know where to find it?(qcd black holes…? Surface of protons, quarks, etc…?) In other words, bio-beings actually have full control over this memory recall aspect of quantum mechanics and what’s been thought to be the uncertainty principle__yet, we certainly do have the power to violate this principle, any moment__at will__by our very own freest of free-wills__to recall almost any past memory state intuition, or almost any memory state concept…

We, as bio-quantum physical beings are pretty amazing. Scientists say we can’t know position and momentum with certainty__yet we daily violate this uncertainty, with the absolute certainty of will, to any action, at any moment we choose, to move the continuum of mind’s storage matter around, from place to place, or memory to perception or concepts__whatever__at will. We are the daily violators of the quantum laws of nature and physics, thus giving us the ability to see the macro results, from the micro actions, of our very own quantum choices. So, lil’ ol’ bio-human choice, all by its lonesome, violates both the laws of quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle__At the mind’s quantum state level. If this ain’t a rationally necessary proof of violation__I don’t know what is. We have the power, as simple bio-beings, to move space/matter/wave energy motions__At least, at our micro field/matter bio-being levels__and I’m not even counting all our macro bio-being level violations…

I’m looking for serious feedback, in all this quantum mind matrix theorizing__especially since it’s ‘the hard problem’ of most all recent AI scientific philosophical research, as well as most all cognitive psychological AI research. Thanks in advance…

Premonitions = Pre-Cognitions...

Premonitions are pre-cognitions of events to come, which in the eyes of the West are the foolish goal of 'Destroy The Terrorists.' One's wisdom, when totally viewed from the highest advantage point, would quickly see the vanity of this vision. The West thinks the terrorists are acting on a religious premonition__They are wrong. The terrorists are acting on the will to live a lil'. If the West sincerely listened to the whole intellectual argument, they'd find terrorism is not about religious will, but the will of poverty, crying out to a deaf West. Until the West awakens to the truth of the terrorist problem, being at base, a poverty problem__The West is acting on a false premonition, or pre-cognition of false will, at base. This is much the problem of all modern thinking mentality's base problem. Being born into false ideologies, one finds it extremely difficult to see the forest for the trees. Pre-cognitions have been scientifically considered false premises to base any thought on, yet all governmet ideology functions on nothing but its false premonitions of the deeper under-lying facts, of the over-development of under-development__which has taken place over the last 50+ years. Oh, should the West ever awaken to the truth of its own real actions, on the greater world of increasing poverty, created by the West, they'll be in for quite a shock...

I'm well aware of the problems, from the very bottom of the poverty canopy, to its Western created top__Yet our foot soldiers of truly better ideas and solutions are few and far between, Even getting people to recognize the true problem, being one of massive poverty, which stirs the emotions, desires and passions of so many, is yet seen as immaturity, when in fact, it's the true reality of all strife, in this otherwise wonderful world__but how is a world to be awakened, when it's youth believe in the ideology of self-improvement, when systems' improvement, is what's truly needed. Youth has always thought this passionate way, since recorded by the Greeks, the European Enlightenment period, on into the American Revolution era, and extending into the French and English revolutionary periods__Yet every time, it took systems' evolution solutions, to quell the angers, on all sides. Yet, were it not for youth's rebellious spirit, maybe none of the modern developments of our cherished liberty evolutions would never have taken place. But, youth must see through the idealogical evolutions of its youthful passions, and recognize, it's always been system's evolutions__That's always saved the day, just as the French, or even the Chileans had to destroy the youth movements, to bring the needed systems' orders back into the fore, to save everyone's desired will to live a lil'...

History is always on the side of the higher intellectual canopy__When all is finally said and done... It always will be__As it's the only logical necessity of survival__Possible...

TIME FOR A NEW “NEW DEAL”

This is an older article by Marshall Auerback, but one of the best about what was done by FDR, and what should now be done.

But consider the historic precedents. In the words of Professor Paul Davidson:

Let us look at a historical example where if this type of “what will cost to the tax payer and/or the economy?” question were asked, one of the most desirable government policies would never have been undertaken. At the Bretton Woods conference it was recognized that the European nations would need significant aid to help rebuild their economies after the war. Keynes estimated that the need would be between $12 and $15 billion. U.S. representative Harry Dexter White indicated that Congress could not ask the taxpayers to provide more than $3 billion. Accordingly, the Keynes Plan was defeated at Bretton Woods, and the Dexter White proposals were adopted:

Suppose that in 1946 it was recommended that U.S. give a gift of $13 billion dollars over four years to various European countries to help them rebuild their war-ravaged economies (in 1940s current dollars, this sum would be well over $150 billion in 2007 dollars). Obviously if Dexter White was correct, the Congress would never have approved the Marshall Plan. Since the Marshall Plan did not reveal in advance that it would provide foreign governments $13 billion over a period of four years, Congress approved the Marshall Pan. The Marshall Plan gave foreign nations approximately two percent of the United States’ GDP each year for four years. Was the Marshall Plan costly to U.S. taxpayers and the U.S. economy?

The statistics indicate that, during the Marshall Plan years, for the first time in history the U.S. did not experience a serious economic slowdown immediately after a war. And this despite the fact that federal government expenditures on goods and services declined by approximately 57 percent between 1945 and 1946. Furthermore, four years after World War II, federal government expenditure was still approximately half of what it had been in 1945.

When the U.S. emerged from World War II, the federal debt was more than 100 percent of the GDP. Accordingly, there was great political pressure to reign in federal government spending to make sure that the federal debt did not grow substantially. Clearly, then, it was not “Keynesian” deficit spending that kept the U.S. out of recession in the immediate post-World War II years.

What was the cost of the Marshall Plan to the U.S. economy and the U.S. taxpayer? In 1946, the GDP per capita was 25 percent higher than it had been in the last peace years before the War. GDP per capita continued to grow during the Marshall Plan years. Despite giving away two percent of U.S. GDP, American residents (and taxpayers) experienced a higher standard of living each year. – (Paul Davidson, “How to Solve the US Housing Problem and Avoid a Recession: A Revived HOLC and RTC” - Schwartz Center For Economic Policy Analysis: Policy Note, January 2008)
(Continue...)

Intra-Objective Communication of the Subjective…

Hi SB, good post. I’m trying to find a compliable ground of communication between your ideas of, let’s just use Lesley’s term__altruism, to generally represent part of your ideas, as your geometric ideas are not in dispute with my ideas__to show possible areas of union between your totalities of ideas and mine.

We need a middle ground of passing right brained altruistic ideas into the pragmatic and practical ground of left brained logical, social and material reality. This is why I’ve so often mentioned ‘esthetics’ as the idea that can convert the right brain volitions, altruism, etc., into left brained values of liberty, etc., which are compatible and compliable with left brained mixed pragmatism, yet a more incentivized right brained altruism, and a less incentivized left brained greed, than we presently have. What I’m meaning is a method of wedding infinite psychology, the objective substrate of science, into a more finite possibility of true social improvement, possibly through a new intra-objective communication of the subjective, without losing any of the value of the subjective contributions to social reality.

I think we are both looking for a universal algorithm of both geometry and evolution, which is fully compatible with both hemisphere’s of the minds. The algorithm must be capable of passing right brained psychology into left brained reality__in other words, how do infinite intuitions plug into finite concepts? Imo, this algorithm is more solvable at the international actions level of the interactions of nations, than as a personal algorithm, since nations’ epistemology has reduced the complexity to less terms involved. At this level there are three major methods of solving differences, 1.politics, 2.money, and 3.war. Of course, the method that relates universally from the international level to the personal is 1.the political__and I don’t think the personal-political has yet been explored thoroughly enough, by us or anyone else, as a real solution. I think it may allow us access to the universal algorithm we are seeking.

Selfless-Semi-Altruistic Government --> E=1/5X --> The Geometry of Incentivized Liberty…

100% Altruism = No Altruism__So, the solution must be a semi-systemic solution --> E=1/5X…

The old method was Pareto’s 80%-20% law, of poverty to wealth ratio. Presently, it’s about 90%-10% market law, of poverty to wealth ratio. The selfless-semi-altruistic government of a fully geometric incentivized liberty, would be about a 60%-40% law, of middle-class well-being of all, to wealth ratio__A much fairer and sensible ratio…

The E=1/5X ratio of selfless-semi-altruistic government is a public owned market system, in competition against private owned free-market greed, to allow public and private market laws to be sliding time scale changed, to the 60%-40% ratio over ten years__to work the magic of the most for all, and the esthetic best order possible__as a partially incentivized system is absolutely necessary to rescue all citizens from the horrors of a possible totalitarian communism, down the road__as history clearly shows, any nation can easily evolve into the despised totalitarianisms, as even past democracies have…

We must get America, and the rest of the world back to a sensible scientific methodology of actionable intelligence, or all our gooses are cooked__Mother Goose in the nuclear frying pan, ain’t a pretty picture, but that’s where we’re headed, if we don’t wake up…

The sliding time scaled laws, I’m referring to, must have real teeth__that means a minimum absolute fine of 10% of total gross value of businesses and corporations not complying__Otherwise, we have no chance of any form of semi-altruistic-government, what-so-ever…

Welcome to the future…

The Universal Spiritual Geometry of Nature…

Universal values of nature and naturalism…
The rhetorical triad__’Ethos’, ‘Pathos’, ‘Logos…’
The power of invalid validity…
Private language abstract-beliefs have the validity of existence…
Academics’ and science’s prejudice of universal values…
Science, excluding universal values, excludes science, and invalidates science…
Academics’, excluding universal values, excludes academics, and invalidates academics…
Values, excluding science, exclude values of science…
The mentalities of methods…
Proper and improper methods…
Bad method obliterates judgment…
The experiential method is far too fallible…
The scientific method is far less fallible…
Prejudiced values vs. prejudiced science…
1. 1st Philosophy__Universal Values__Metaphysics…
2. 2nd Philosophy__Universal Science__Mixed Metaphysics and Particularity…
3. 3rd Philosophy__Particular Science__’Closed Methodology…’
4. 4th Philosophy__Universal Unification Attempts and Failure…
5. 5th Philosophy__Final Unification__’Open ‘Methodicity…’

A New Understanding of Methodology vs. ‘Methodicity…’

If one just carefully looks at how I’ve premised this post from, ‘The Universal Spiritual Geometry of Nature…’ to ‘A New Understanding of Methodology vs. Methodicity…’, one should be able to detect the problem we are all rolling around in here at ToeQuest, in trying to unify ideas, without a proper method to do so. The first ideas to understand are the thus far non-clarity of mentalities’ order of progression in history, which is mentioned last, under the numbered headings. Looking back over history, one would realize mentalities were first organized under a first philosophy of the people’s universal values, or what they early on termed metaphysics, as that was just the natural progression of mentalities’ history.

But, when they started developing particular ideas in depth, they ran into a conflict in their first philosophy, and found they needed to extend its definition and content, to account for particularities, they could not universalize, such as number, etc. So, there began the development of a second philosophy of universal science, which was the mixed ideas of metaphysics and particular sciences__as best they could delve into them, with their early crude instruments, but there shortly there-after set in the great schools battles__of which was the true ideas of the times__which has continued to this very day.

The developed crises of the schools of differing thought required a third philosophy to be born, which was the Greek’s early thoughts of methodology, attributed to Thales__One of the seven sages. Thales is given credit by many Greeks as being the first scientist/philosopher. Of course these are very crude sciences of methodology, but they did work for these early people, and some aspects were quite accurate, such as in astronomy and business. The point is, a methodology was necessary to quell the angered passions between the first philosophy and the second philosophy, of the times__and it was Thales’ methodology of science that served this purpose, which is still with us, with refinements__right to this day.

The problem is, that all through the ages of mentalities’ evolution, no-one truly noticed the damage being incurred to first philosophy’s value system, by third philosophy’s methodology__through the drastic separation and prejudice of the collective schools of thought, against universal values. This has been a slow and encroaching process, so slow, it’s been barely detectable, yet we all feel it__but it’s finally been detected, and is being written about, by several authors around the world. When thoroughly understood, in all its damaging actions, one will become aware of the power of its ability to even destroy our needed judgments of ordering proper civil societies__as has been recorded by Peter Alexander Meyers, titled ‘Method and Civic Education’.

Now that we’ve invented and used this third philosophical method for millennia, we are trying to invent a fourth philosophy of unification, which is ending in failure__Because the systems we are trying to unify are of opposite groundings. That is the first philosophy is of open grounding, or background independence, and the second and third philosophies of science are of a closed methodology and grounding. These three systems put us in the position of the ancient Greeks trying to unite fire and ice. How’s it to be done, when the one always destroys the other…?

This is why I’m suggesting a fifth philosophical system, I’m titling ‘Methodicity’, which is an entirely new method of unification of closed and open systems__or the unification of closed methodology and open methodology. Of course, when one scans the internet, this isn’t a new word, but I’m giving it the special definition job, of uniting the opposites of closed and open systems__that is, the extremes of opposites, into new lucid conceptualisms and common sense__Which I’m really interpreting as no more than ‘Science With Values__True Universal Values...’

This would be my contribution to ‘The Universal Spiritual Geometry of Nature…’ I’ll just let this post sink in a bit, and get back to its implications later. For now, I’d recommend reading the linked article above by, Peter Alexander Meyers, titled ‘Method and Civic Education’… One can not use the old ‘Closed ‘Methodologies’ to unify the world’s many differing ideas__Imo, one must use this new ‘Open ‘Methodicity’, to unify the many differing ideas, of Earth’s many opinions and facts…

The Crisis of Personal Consciousness and Civic Consciousness...

Everyone wants to write as though they were exempt from our problems of civic consciousness, yet are thoroughly blind to their own personal consciousness crisis. Take a good hard look at Sandoz’s article; It’s about no-one on Earth being exempt from the globes massive problems of histories mentalities of consciousness evolution__This includes the Buddhist who improperly interprets love, as nothing more than the self-love lies of his/her own experiential egos__as well as all educated and academic intellectuals who improperly interpret knowledge, as nothing more than the self-knowledge lies of his/her own ego experiences__No-one on Earth exempt from the self-demon of fallible experiential methods of false knowledges and interpretations of...

It was long ago proved there was only one method to avoid the fallible pitfalls of experiential love of the self-ego__And that just happens to have been the scientific method, put forward by the middle period Persians. We can all indulge our personal Experiences until the ends of our sad lives, but the true light of day will never be encountered__Until one realizes, only the scientific method of grounded proofs is possible of finding and knowing any truths about either personal consciousness or public consciousness__And that takes a great deal of understanding, about “Breaking on through, to the other side”, as mentioned in Jim Morrison’s words. Most are completely unaware of what this truly means__It’s much more than the simple experiential worship of dead gurus and fallacious academics and pseudo-religious leaders. It’s understanding the honest truths within all the lies of these same people__Seeing the real civic consciousness created by these same lies, that actually creates the firm social fabric, which holds all hope and society together__as a functioning social entity.

Yes, the preacher, teacher, academic, intellectual, businessman, lover or and greedomites all have their evil ways and lies, but the point all miss is just what Ellis Sandoz and Kolakowski speak of__That all and extreme important essence spirit of social consciousness, that pervades all societies__In good times, as well as bad times. And, it’s these bad times where the social/civic spirit of nations must be restored__and it won’t be restored by individual over-worship of the personal ego-experiences, when it’s truly the social fabric of instutions and systems that really in need of the repairs. So, throw away the idiosyncratic self-worships of self-egos and all historical egoistic gurus and other such creatures, and see for the first time in your lives__The true civic consciousness…

How Does A Particle/Wave See, Hear and Talk To A Particle/Wave…?

1.The fundamental scientific mechanics of logical a priori necessity__First…

2.Logic__The necessary scientific method of mind before thought…

3.Experience and necessity__Action first…

4.Man/Woman/Child__Nature’s only scientifically able creatures…

5. The triadic universal is the scaling agent of the dyadic opposites__into the new common sense...

6.The soul’s invalidity__Its historical evolution to invalidity…

7.Spirit and intuition without geometry is not spirit and intuition…

8.The physiology of logical necessity__Physical organ required…

9.The necessary a priori__Matter first, to contain images/thought…

10.The axiom of necessary liberty…

11.Individual freedom necessitates moral liberty…

12.Mind on a pedestal__No__Logical brain mechanics first…

13.The logical brain/mind mechanics of geometric imaging…

Are we all in a fog of thinking we are grounded, when we are truly not…? What is your fundamental ground__Before first thought…? I think we can explore all of the physical and mental universe, by just honestly answering these questions__And I do mean, all of quantum and relative mechanics, as well as all of brain, mind and thought mechanics__from all emotions to all scientific methods and answers. It’s simply a very short distance from quantum mind to all of quantum and relative physics__as a matter of fact, I’ll simply state, ‘It’s one and the same…’

When physics can answer the title question, we’ll(the general concensus) grant it true ground__But not until… The skeptic holds all the cards in this question alone__and physics, philosophy and psychology will always be out on an invalid limb, until they venture a truly grounded logical answer to this first, and most important fundamental question__Basically, “What is mind, and how does it work…?”

I’ll leave everyone to ponder the question, and the few clues I’ve posted, and return later…

A Ten Year Model Of Change...

The Inverse Theorem of Value__Iff Capitalist System Incentive Mechanics’ Value Is Transferred From Commodities, Goods, Services, Prices, Wages and Profits, to Fiat Money System Law, Real Wealth Can Be Created for All World Citizens…

Substrate / | \ Superstrate
Moral Science / | \ Contract Science
Mind / | \ Anti-Mind
Metaphysics / | \ Epistemics__Extra-Rational Thought / | \ Rational Thought
The God of How Much Information Man Can Process, Against Collected Information__Geo-Bio-Resistance to Bio-Processing
China's Dead Debt Stabilizes Her Live Debt

Pseudo-education has geared us to look at and into the substrate to procure our wants and needs, while in fact, all this does is produce a super-structure__We now know is destroying the entire living system. For millennia the substrate of the human soul has sustained us well, but now we have reached the pinnacle/apex of its proper functioning__where what's stored in the innate human soul is now castrating our intellectual intelligence. This is why I'm concentrating so much on the superstrate's influence over the substrate.

What we've inadvertently never looked at, is how the innate human soul scientifically functions__yet this is possible, if one just takes the time to look. I'm simply talking about when mind becomes anti-mind, with the evolution of complexity, due to nature's natural resources being depleted__to the point innate human mind and soul must change__or die. The substrate of human soul no longer serves the purpose it did__when resources were plentiful__yet the same superstrate information entered into soul, memory and intellect is not changing on a large enough mind domain, due to battles between minds and anti-minds, metaphysics' extra-rational thought, and epistemics' rational thought__and the even greater battles between moral science and contract science.

This is all being controlled by the God of how much information man can process, against all the collected information controlled by and controlling him__through the greater geo-bio-resistance 'god' to his bio-processing abilities, and all being reflected back into these bio-minds__through the superstrate's superstructure process of China's dead debt stabilizing her live debt processes__against our pseudo-school's outdated substrate interpretations of. China's leading the way with over thirty+ years of government/market integrations__while the West's lost substrate soul and mind tries to figure the entire mess out__without realizing it must process soul and mind as China does__Superstrate to substrate and back to superstrate, on and on, again and again. It's the old 'I Ching' middle way, just as ProfPat has posted about their Trigrams__The triadic understanding rules the world, as it's always looking at the world holistically, when power is not blinded, by over-concentrations on the substrates of pseudo-educations' falsehoods...

We'd soon better awake to the proper soul and mind functions of the superstrate into the substrate__then back out to the new super-structures that are truly being built right in front of our own very blind eyes__China is attempting a 5th generation environmental policy. That means skipping the industrial mess of the West. Of course, right now, it doesn't look too promising, as they are truly the dirtiest nation on Earth__But at least, that's the multi-year plan of the central planning committee. At the least, they are beginning to open their triadic eyes...